Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
很奇怪，不但缺点继承第一部，原来的优点也给整没了，战术细节不突出，特效渲染像动画，后期配音太出戏，连嘴型都对不上。很多镜头两部共用，所以说最开始应该就只有一部，硬是剪成两部来圈钱，不地道啊
虽说这种片子对演技要求不高，但是演员们你们能再敷衍一点吗。
百感交集，革命精神永存我心，党领导下的中国人民不惧豪强从来不服输，对待美国人也从来不低头不手软，这一波文化输出唤醒民族魂，不止我们当过兵的记得，更多的城镇居民孩子们更应当补上这一课，只有国家安全，才有安居乐业。
太可了，我三年的眼泪都在这2个多小时里流完了——平河死得太惨烈了，余从戎悲壮，唉，要是把吴京片中的武打动作设计减少一点，就更好了
所以说电影都应该找好自己的定位和受众，作为一部春节档面向最广大人民群众的电影，完全是足够合格的。但是如果真要挑剔一下……首先开头的人海冲锋就看得寻求历史的人一脸懵，其次这也难怪被称为样板戏，单纯强调敌人物质上的强大来和自身条件的艰苦做对比，但是敌人本身确完完全全没有灵魂的工具角色，这就有些精神原子弹了，毕竟这是实事，过度突出主角个人色彩，那还真不如战狼来得出彩，要就拍成大决战一类述史的电影。最后，我国的电影工业还是有待进步，个别场面的绿幕感实在太浓重了。
还行吧，一代人的苦与泪造就了下一代人的平安与繁荣富强。在这里吴京的主角光环终于得到了全方位的展示。
至于这场战争，不必作过多的评价，看看现在的朝鲜和现在的韩国，所有答案一目了然
很喜欢的一个点是，战役从来不仅仅是的英雄主义无畏牺牲，更多的是科技军备和战略谋划，自甘做炮灰的一腔孤勇，在铸就胜利者的勋章中远远不够。而电影里就有很多军事谋略的体现，排兵布阵，临场应变，上到带队的将领，下到一线士兵，带着智慧和热血前赴后继。
咱们就是说宣传祖国强大民族精神的为什么不给满分
我很爱国，我也铭记历史。但是这种不太有剧情的主旋律是真不想老了。
（华夏影城长沙龙湾商业广场店）陪长辈去影院看完了这部电影，第一感觉就是真的太长了，电影叙事大逻辑含糊，很拖拉。说实在的，剧情、画面、演员的演技特效都可以，就真的是太拖拉了。原本以为结束了，又整一个小高潮，高潮完了想着终于要结束了吧，md又来一个刺点，转折太多都有点看腻了。另外最后是哪位大佬把三位指导导的戏合在一起的？敢情是谁也不想得罪么，电影结尾就是三位导演的三段结尾生接在一起，甚至看风格就知道哪一段结局是哪一位大佬的风格。最后一段结局结束的时候的结尾音乐也是很硬，和画面不相融。整体来看，从画面、演技来看，给电影四星，剧情拖拉扣一星，综合三星。
跟第一部一样精彩，全程没有尿点，战争场面拍的很好。
场面依旧宏大，向真实战争中新中国的勇士们致敬，但电影整体叙述剧情不连贯，而且带小朋友来看的话，很残酷
正是因为有那些勇于冲锋甘于奉献不畏牺牲的英雄才能有如今的和平年代，战争场面和整体观感比第一部要好。
显然是因为易烊千玺才看了长津湖和水门桥。我可能最不喜欢的电影类型就是恐怖片和战争片。这两个类型的画面有时候是冲击性和可能引起创伤体验的。观影过程有感动，但也有让我感觉不舒服的地方。我可能无法去回看国家为了独立和强大付出的这些血的代价，由于实力悬殊巨大，基本上自我牺牲是常态，甚至因为带着对战友的愧疚和已有的惨痛代价而为了胜利成为必选项，我很感动更感到悲凉。
没看下去，可能是我的问题，和导演、演员无关。
虽然冲锋的场面比较硬伤，但一个连的人拿命炸桥只能炸个窟窿的事情，确实感觉比较真实。桥这种东西嘛，就是炸很多次千疮百孔没法修了，才是所谓的炸完了。一个小BUG是，好像每次都差不多同一个部位，而且桥本身，建筑工程方面的描述也偏少。
比第一部好多了，文戏挺煽情的，尤其是那句“新中国万岁”，战斗牺牲场面很震撼，也很真实，真的是战至最后一人，九连干脆就打没了，战术布置也有了，但李延年珠玉在前，面对美军重火力抱团冲锋，零下40度迫击炮从未哑火，战士直接把缴获的电台打掉，连长时刻缺失在指挥位置上等等小毛病还是无法完全满意
能激发各位深沉强烈的爱国情感，
如果是我面对就只有害怕
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
