剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 杉涵 3小时前 :

    故事的设定很悬浮,演员的表演到是很不错。结尾的主题升华非常公式化。

  • 豆博敏 3小时前 :

    不错,全是出乎意料的反转。尤戴着眼罩那段太鬼畜。另,存钱方法被我学到了。

  • 苌谷之 9小时前 :

    形式大于内容,多角度叙事,但是内容稍显薄弱,好多个重要节点都有点轻描淡写了,不过瘾!

  • 郸绣梓 2小时前 :

    感觉和《无名之辈》有点像,最近还挺喜欢这种一个室内就完成的片子,不断反转,挺过瘾的。

  • 滕起运 2小时前 :

    剧本耐不住推敲,手法又显得露怯,文本精细度和调度精巧度都不够,以至于不停的闪回反转随着手法的重复愈加疲软无力,这种片子放在十五年前很酷很潮,现在真的很土很low。范伟的口音梦回偏春晚小品,窦骁跟范伟搭的时候有种刘老根大舞台上临时组合演德云社的即视感,张颂文无功无过不值一提。看完只觉得,明明一个人满为患的老式小区为什么被编导设置得这么真空,几个天井俯视都没有人烟,跟老张交易时候领这么多孩子进小区不怕监控和邻居,一群人在屋里打闹摔东西没人报警便罢,都特么冰箱爆炸了还没有邻居第一时间报警,真是高估这种老式小区的隔音并低估邻居八婆的没事儿找事儿能力了。

  • 真平灵 6小时前 :

    7/10 一遍一遍回溯,故事越来越清晰,还可以吧

  • 鲁高杰 0小时前 :

    说虚伪点,挺好。说真诚点,真挺好。挺高兴能看到国产黑色幽默电影能有这样的制作水准。有点《夜店》,有点《轻松+愉快》,又有点《疯狂的石头》。金马影帝范伟搭配窦骁张颂文梁超,演技都是在线的选手。剧情上来讲虽然有诸多点还可以仔细斟酌,BUG也不在少数,但整体剧情推进、节奏、剪辑都还不错。尤其摄影要给个加分,悬念制造上也挺高级的。但是老闫那愚蠢的同伙(戴眼镜被关在厕所里的)编剧是不是还可以把他再润色润色,唯一在人设上有点失败的角色。整体三星半。

  • 贾香旋 8小时前 :

    第一次看这种"剧本杀"式的故事,还挺新鲜的,几个反转也算有趣。

  • 牵若雁 9小时前 :

    还有莉莉,她的酒窝很漂亮,和梅婷一样吧 我很喜欢她笑。这里,她对外卖小哥倒是很用心,发现不对劲就让他走,然后就是老范。

  • 生金玉 0小时前 :

    范伟台词一出口我还是觉得他在讲小品哈哈哈哈,但是影帝就是影帝,那表情神态拿捏的死死的,能给电影加不少分。故事也是个好故事,窦骁后期转变的张力不够,所以结局拉胯了点。

  • 璐涵 8小时前 :

    (玩手机听电影系列)出乎意料的好看了,挺惊喜,国产大烟枪

  • 濮阳俏丽 7小时前 :

    确实反转和悬疑,也拍得合格,演员们表现也不错。就是不够惊喜,黑色幽默有,只是不够好。巧合利用得好就是好,如何叠加产生剧情需要的冲突和设计,恰如其分表现出来,难哦。窦骁的小怂外卖员和最后的财欲焚心的黑道大佬似的,只能说明,这个男人只是平时怂,一旦有切口什么坏事都是做得出来。缺了一个给自己的借口而已。

  • 鄢元英 3小时前 :

    一般吧,低成本小场景黑色幽默不停反转,但短片的内核硬被拉长到106分钟,而且出现了一些难以自圆其说的bug,最后的结尾也是扣分项,及格分还是有的。

  • 柔娅 1小时前 :

    剧作模仿痕迹较重,人物塑造有些敷衍,镜头语言合格,演员没啥问题,6.5。

  • 野方方 8小时前 :

    虽然BUG挺多,但一环又一环的反转,每次都让你意想不到,还挺有趣的。三星电影,因为各位的演技再加一星。

  • 百里明煦 8小时前 :

    典型的不知名导演和主创在剧本上下了很大的功夫的作品,能想象开了多少个都不满足的剧本会。可惜都不会回到源头问问自己,这个故事到底值不值得,观众到底会看的理由是什么。表演好不好就显得一点也不重要了。

  • 辰宇 6小时前 :

    不停的反转,最终也没有反转出一朵花出来!故弄玄虚过分了就成了装逼,就成了画虎不成反类犬!

  • 竭芳茵 3小时前 :

    有的地方紧张中带着一点诙谐 还挺逗的 但觉得小马的人设有点立不住 感觉要么更强一点要么更普通一点...emm

  • 满敏叡 0小时前 :

    沉浸式剧本杀+小品包袱大合集。娱乐性超强,一步一个笑点,一步一个反转。上一秒笑出鹅叫,下一秒直呼卧槽。真正做到了最后一秒都是笑点。最后善恶终有报,皆大欢喜。导演野心很大,成品差强人意

  • 那瑞锦 4小时前 :

    靠一句话掰成三瓣说来搞悬疑搞反转都是耍流氓

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved